*Update 9/17/25: The U.S. Department of Agriculture is accepting written comments beginning Aug. 29, 2025, on alternatives or effects and on relevant information, studies, or analyses with respect to the proposal. Written comments must be received no later than Sept. 19, 2025. Refer to the notice of intent for more details about this action.
To comment, use one of the following methods:
- Electronically (preferred): Go to the notice posted on Regulations.gov. After reading the notice, click on the Comment button.
- Mail: Hardcopy letters must be submitted to the Director, Ecosystem Management Coordination, 201 14th Street SW, Mailstop 1108, Washington, DC 20250-1124.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has announced its intention to repeal the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule. This rule, which has been the subject of long-running legal and political debate, currently protects approximately 45 million acres of national forest lands from new road construction and certain types of timber harvesting.
Opponents of the repeal argue that it would threaten clean water supplies, wildlife habitats, and popular recreational areas. They also point out that the rule already allows for activities to reduce wildfire risk. Supporters of the repeal argue that the rule is outdated and that rescinding it would give local forest managers more flexibility to manage forests, reduce the risk of wildfires, and promote economic development.
It may seem odd for a motorcycle GPS app to have a stance on this issue but we are concerned that if repealed without a more specific doctrine that allows public input to be discussed, the following harm can be done.
1. Preservation of Backcountry Trail Systems: The Roadless Rule protects large, unfragmented areas of national forests. This is where many of the most challenging and rewarding OHV trails exist, providing a true backcountry experience. Repealing the rule could lead to the fragmentation of these areas with new roads for commercial logging or mining, which would degrade the very landscapes and trails that motorcyclists seek out.
2. Protection of Existing Trails: The rule allows for recreation, including motorcycle and OHV use on existing trails. It does not close trails or prohibit motorized access where it already exists. The concern is that new commercial roads could lead to a loss or degradation of the existing trail network.
3. Conservation of Shared Resources: Many motorcyclists are also hunters, anglers, or enjoy other forms of outdoor recreation. They recognize that the Roadless Rule protects critical wildlife habitats, migration corridors, and watersheds. These are all resources that benefit the outdoor community as a whole, including those who ride. Repealing the rule could negatively impact the very ecosystems that support the broader outdoor lifestyle.
TAKE ACTION: Contact the U.S. Department of Agriculture following the directions above.
.avif)
